In 2010 I published this poster in my local area after getting permission from Breakthru Technology to use their artwork and some of their text ... I was right ! Now we are seeing these technologies coming out.
"Perseverance brings good fortune", Ancient Chinese saying.
"It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by the dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worthy course; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." - Theodore Roosevelt
A Chain Reaction ...
E-Cat LENR <------- Eco Global Fuels Electrolysis (Hydrogen, Solanal/Ethanol) | ^ | | | Solanol v | v Heat ------> Stop gap production of a synthetic petrol that would not pollute, | ie Transfer of LENR energy into liquid form. Remember ... | ... there are LOTS of combustion engines out there. v | ^ Turbines -------> Electricity | | LENR/Cold Fusion ------> Eventual use of transmutation of elements electro-chemistry Super Imploder -----> Increased crop growth with no fertilisers or pesticides.
Disclaimer: Please note that I do not have any financial investment in these Breakthru Technologies. I am not a marketeer or financial investor. I do not have any interests to further with these devices apart from wanting to see people's life's improved by genuinely clean, safe and affordable technologies. I simply want to see people INFORMED.
Official Website: http://breakthru-technologies.com/
"It is not a dream, it is a simple feat of scientific electrical engineering, only expensive - blind, faint-hearted, doubting world! . . . Humanity is not yet sufficiently advanced to be willingly led by the discover's keen searching sense. But who knows? Perhaps it is better in this present world of ours that a revolutionary idea or invention instead of being helped and patted, be hampered and ill-treated in its adolescence - by want of means, by selfish interest, pedantry, stupidity and ignorance; that it be attacked and stifled; that it pass through bitter trials and tribulations, through the heartless strife of commercial existence. So do we get our light. So all that was great in the past was ridiculed, condemned, combated, suppressed - only to emerge all the more powerfully, all the more triumphantly from the struggle."
Quoted from "The Transmission of Electrical Energy without wires as a means for furthering Peace" by Nikola Tesla in Electrical World and Engineer , 7 January 1905, Wikiquote.
"Let the man of learning, the man of lettered leisure, beware of that queer and cheap temptation to pose to himself and to others as a cynic, as the man who has outgrown emotions and beliefs, the man to whom good and evil are as one. The poorest way to face life is to face it with a sneer. There are many men who feel a kind of twister pride in cynicism; there are many who confine themselves to criticism of the way others do what they themselves dare not even attempt. There is no more unhealthy being, no man less worthy of respect, than he who either really holds, or feigns to hold, an attitude of sneering disbelief toward all that is great and lofty, whether in achievement or in that noble effort which, even if it fails, comes to second achievement. A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life's realities - all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority but of weakness. They mark the men unfit to bear their part painfully in the stern strife of living ..."
This page is dedicated to a hundred years of struggle by people working to lay the foundations so we can see the fruit of their struggles TODAY. We are standing on the shoulders of giants.
So what exactly is a "breakthrough technology" ? Well who better to quote than NASA on this ?
Figure adapted from Innovation, the Attacker's Advantage, R. Foster, 1986. Image credit: NASA.
"The S-Curve figure illustrates both the evolution of a given technology, and the breakthrough event when a new, superior technology becomes viable. For a given technology, the evolution is as follows: Initial efforts result in little advancement and then the technology becomes successful. This success point, at the lower knee of the curve, is where the technology has finally demonstrated its utility. After this point significant progress and improvements are made as several embodiments are produced and the technology becomes widely established. Eventually, however, the physical limits of the technology are reached, and continued effort results in little additional advancement. This evolution (effort expended versus performance gains) takes the form of an S-Curve. To go beyond the limits of the top of a predecessor's S-Curve, a new alternative must be created. This new alternative will have its own S-curve and will eventually require yet another new approach to surpass its performance limits. The breakthrough event, is when the new method demonstrates its viability to exceed past the limits of its predecessor."
Quoted from Breakthrough Technologies (NASA Glenn Research Center). This page is a work in progress ...
The E-Cat is a revolutionary technology that has emerged from the Cold Fusion arena which first started in 1989. It is basically a form of nuclear reaction without damaging radiation or toxic by products. Mainstream commentators casually discount this technology because it appears to violate well known laws of physics. However, the Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) that drive the device have not been widely studied or accepted by "mainstream" science due to the rejection of "Cold Fusion" in 1989. Tests carried out on the E-Cat have shown the effect to be real and the track record of Rossi and associated industries remain, up to the present time, impeccable.
Latest LENR-to-Market Weekly always --> at the top of this page.
(Top links are most recent)
Here are the Breakthru Technologies PDFs extracted to images. The most recent versions of them are here.
Clarke's First Law: When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
Clarke's Second Law: The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
"Hazards of Prophecy: The Failure of Imagination" in Profiles of the Future (1962), Wikiquote.
Breakthru Technologies have made the wise decision to bypass the scientific establishment and go straight to market. This brings it's own problems in the short-term with accusations of fraud and often rude and slanderous "proofs" of fraud of a personal nature being published that simply aren't fair. So far (this is a developing story) the accusations of fraud seem to be based on perceived lack of testing and some rather absurd video of the inventor twiddling a few knobs and looking rather angrily at the camera; I would say because he picked up on a test of his technology being treated unfairly and used for a form of character assassination. The key point here is fairness. Everyone knows the sad history of inventions that can't be explained using traditional scientific theories. This leads to a huge catch-22 where an inventor is asked to carry out tests to "prove" the technology (see The Wright Brothers and Cold Fusion - Jed Rothwell, Local copy). However the results of these tests is really a moot point because the approach towards the "impossible" inventions is often a fait accompli. A scientist who is not willing to change their scientific understanding in the face of "impossible" results will ALWAYS fail the technology and call it a fraud, however convincing and perfect the test. We've seen this in another field ... parapsychology. Dean Radin has documented the very large weight of evidence to show that clairvoyance, telepathy and the like is real and can be scientifically proved. However many of those who claim to represent "real" science have their minds already made up about parapsychology ... it cannot happen so they will do anything to make sure it doesn't. This is why this is not so simple as putting forward a technology such as the E-Cat for testing and then watching the world community pass that technology as proven. Yet despite the evidence of the SOCIOLOGICAL context of these discoveries many scientists continue to demand ad hoc testing in denial of the context that these discoveries take place. This is not an irrelevant insight. Science does not exist in a vacuum and is part of society.
However, having said all that, demanding a simple test to prove that a device such as the E-Cat outputs more power than is input to it is basically a fair one, but in denial of the sociological context. But this will come in time, in the next five to ten years, as companies and organisations actually buy this thing and put it into action. Rossi, Breakthru Technologies and other marketeers, researchers and inventors/scientists have simply chosen to bypass the usual scientific procedures for these kind of inventions. This may seem arrogant, but I would ask readers to think fairly. If this technology is real - as I know it is - then it is very ground breaking and deserves to be given to the world, not buried in scientific testing procedures that have been known to bury legitimate technologies. (see The Wright Brothers and Cold Fusion - Jed Rothwell, Local copy).
Cold Fusion has been achieved that is truly green and safe whereas polluting Hot Fusion is NOT that much safer or greener than NuclearRef1 and is pushed by the same lobby that bought us the Nuclear problem who are closely connected to the Nuclear weapons arms dealers. Do you really want to listen to those guys ? Or would you rather trust a group of 100 - 150 scientists that refused to believe that Pons and Fleischmanns Cold Fusion effect had been "disproven" and have been having Cold Fusion conferences ever since AND NOW HAVE a working viable technology for sale while the "hot" fusion guys (yes, and the Aneutronic people) are still making a lot of promises about a technology that A. They don't have (we DO have Cold Fusion) and B. WOULD NOT BE ANY GREENER THAN NUCLEAR FISSIONRef1.
"The purpose of the addition of the multiplier to the blanket is to compensate for neutron losses. Ultimately, after having penetrated the blanket the neutrons are absorbed in a shield composed of steel and boron carbide. On their way through blanket and shield the neutrons will change the matter from inactive to highly radioactive."
Quoted from High-Level Radioactive Waste from Fusion Reactors, Joachim Gruber, Hahn-Meitner-Institut für Kernforschung GmbH Glienicker Strasse 100, D 1000 Berlin 39, Federal Republic of Germany, mailing address at the time of finishing this paper, 1983: Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, Parts of this paper were added while the author was Visiting Scholar at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
It still takes energy to produce hydrogen which could offset the energy saving created by the eCAT (LENR). However there are other technologies to allow efficient production of hydrogen.
|The mechanism of dd fusion in crystals ch2010_tsyganov IMPORTANT COLD FUSION OVERVIEW.pdf||2.77 MB|