Update: X restored the post after my appeal !
Well this is very revealing of why resolving the problem of abusive psychiatric ideology is such a hard nut (no pun intended) to crack in the USA and UK. Things are much more liberal in Australia with a major study recommending that the police not get involved in incidents of acute distress because it just escalates the problem. Yet no one seems to have heard about this over here.
So what happened ?
Well, I posted an analysis of the use of the word “schizo” after seeing this word come up again in the very interesting context of being used to describe the terrorist in Germany (the one who drove into people). I’ve heard this usage before, which gives away the psychiatric ideology that people have been taught, that suggests that people in acute distress are somehow “dangerous”. I’m not referring to the Germany terrorist who clearly was very dangerous. I’m referring to people who are simply acutely distressed to the point where they enter a condition misunderstood to be “schizophrenia”. With origins in the work of Carl Gustav Jung, R D Laing and then Loren Mosher (and many others) found that this “smelly weird schizo’s” thing that so many people come out with, can BE HEALED by allowing the process to complete. Laing and Mosher both found this ! Far from being “dangerous” they could take these people to a Safehouse, somewhere profoundly different from some locked “schizo ward”, in fact more like a family home. There, with support, these people would come out the other end “weller than well” as Laing put it.
I posted about this on X ..
“This post is of one of many “chinks in the armour” I notice in the often cloaked, bigoted views surrounding acute human distress. I refer to bringing in the word “schizo”. Unfortunately a rather nasty form of psychiatric ideology has taught people that acute human distress is somehow “dangerous” (I’m not referring to acts of terrorism which clearly is very dangerous). Can you imagine what it is like to simply be distressed from a bereavement or whatever life event, only to cross the threshold into this twilight zone where one is suddenly recategorised into some kind of sub-human ? This psychiatric ideology lies at the heart of this pitiless Scientism that rules the roost of “reason” in the West. It claims to be “scientific” but throws the extraordinary nature of human distress and healing that Carl Gustav Jung discovered, as did R D Laing and Loren Mosher. Far from “romanticising” so called “mental illness”, this realisation puts the distressed person back in the driving seat where they are more likely to receive the respect they deserve.“
Only to have the post limited, ironically for “violating their hateful conduct policy” …
This is very profound. In an area that is crying out for free speech and some kind of calm, rational analysis, X’s system reflects the wider acute fear, darkness, claustrophobia and confusion that has been created by this psychiatric ideology. The psychiatric abusers feed off this darkness. They love it. The way they subject some to VERY extreme abuse, often people who were sane and peaceful to begin with, creates them into psychiatric monsters that often terrorise this society. But of course its all a protection racket so the public go running back to this psychiatric ideology begging them to protect them from “dangerous schizo’s”. QED.
15 views